Advanced Bionics Naída CI M90 Instrucciones De Uso página 40

Confirmatory Study
A total of 10 subjects were enrolled in a prospective,
confirmatory study using a within-subjects repeated-
measures design where each subject served as his/her
own control. All 10 subjects used the used the
M T-Mic and electrical stimulation only. The data presented
below show the comparison between AutoSense OS on
a Naída CI M sound processor to AutoSound on a
Naída CI Q sound processor in quiet and noise as well as
a comparison of AutoSense OS On vs AutoSense OS Off
on a Naída CI M sound processor in noise.
Sentences in Quiet at 65 dBA
Similar sentence recognition scores in quiet were
observed between AutoSense OS on a Naída CI M
sound processor and AutoSound on a Naída CI Q sound
processor. See the table below.
N
Mean (SD)
Median
Min, Max
38
N Ci Q
aída
2 l a S
iSt uto ouNd
a S
Verage Core
10
88.31 (5.817)
89.05
80.6 97.4
N
aída
2 l
(%) a
Verage
10
87.30 (10.214)
90.70
72.4
Ci m
a S
iSt uto eNSe
S (%)
Core
98.6
oS